Blagojevich's political
troubles turn radioactive
By: Dave
McKinney
Chicago
Sun-Times
The
now-concluded spring legislative session proved Rod
Blagojevich is a far weaker governor than he was a year
ago.
His
marginalization accelerated in recent months because of
damaging testimony in Tony Rezko’s corruption trial that
has sparked impeachment talk in Springfield.
Throw in the
fact that Blagojevich isn’t trusted, and it’s clear why
nothing on his legislative checklist came to fruition,
and he could do little more than watch as his major ideas
got chewed up and spit out at the Statehouse.
Topping the
futility list is the defeat of his $34 billion public
works program that was his chief priority. Then add the
failure of his $300-per-child tax rebate that was a
cornerstone of his February budget address. The list goes
on and on.
Blagojevich
couldn’t convince legislators to borrow $16 billion to
ease the state’s crushing pension debt, lease the state
lottery, cut business taxes or expand health care.
He couldn’t
secure $150 million in anti-violence funds inspired by a
spring wave of violence in Chicago. He couldn’t find $7.7
million to renovate the Northern Illinois University
lecture hall where five students were shot to death this
year. And his idea for the state to take over Wrigley
Field, home of his beloved Cubs, was a legislative
non-starter.
What this
bitter spring brought Blagojevich was a bloated 2009
state budget that will force him to make perhaps $2.5
billion in politically unpopular cuts. And he got an
ethics bill designed to shut off the fundraising spigot
to his campaign from state contractors — a proposal he
has threatened to rewrite in a way to attack his
legislative enemies.
The governor
achieved some other things this spring that he’s unlikely
to advertise. His work behind the scenes defeated a drive
to change the Constitution so voters could recall inept
or corrupt state politicians — again, something his own
political missteps motivated. Blagojevich’s stealth
mobilization against the recall amendment was in clear
contradiction to his public statements last year in
support of the plan.
The governor
also managed to fend off impeachment, but that threat
continues to lurk in the legislative weeds. House Speaker
Michael Madigan (D-Chicago) revealed Saturday his top
lawyer, David Ellis, had studied the rules governing
impeachment extensively this spring.
"He's a very
conscientious lawyer," Madigan said of his chief counsel.
"He took it upon himself, because we started talking one
day about impeachment, and he volunteered he’d been busy,
busy reading the law books."
Madigan went on
to describe Ellis as "just chock-full of conclusions and
thoughts" about impeachment, a knowledge base Madigan
said allows the House Democratic brain trust "just to be
prepared, that’s all." The topic hasn’t been on the
speaker’s radar screen, he said, for "several weeks."
The speaker
declined to say whether Blagojevich would face
impeachment proceedings or even had committed an
impeachable offense based on testimony at the Rezko
trial. Madigan also wouldn’t take the bait on whether the
governor would be indicted.
But seeming
remotely to acknowledge all of those possibilities,
Madigan would only say "I have no idea" when asked if he
thought Blagojevich would be able to finish his term
through January 2011.
As was the case
last year when Madigan and House Democrats bucked the
governor's legislative agenda, Blagojevich has the
ability to call lawmakers back to Springfield to try to
force them to give him something off his wish list.
But given the
threat of impeachment, even his allies don’t believe
Blagojevich will play the special-session card in the
coming weeks after last year’s draining summer-long
budget impasse when little was achieved but ill will.
"He knows
what’s going on," said Sen. Donne Trotter (D-Chicago)
said of the governor. "From what I’ve heard, he certainly
doesn’t want to stir up the natives and have them start
talking about impeachment and all this other kind of
stuff."
Impeachment
aside, a perfect illustration of the narrow swath
Blagojevich cuts in Springfield these days came Saturday
night when he strode unannounced onto the House floor to
lobby resistant House Democrats to support his stalled
$34 billion public works program.
From Jim
Thompson to George Ryan, it’s been a time-honored
practice for governors and lower-rung statewide
officeholders to go to the House or Senate floors to
champion a pet piece of legislation in a show of strength
before a favorable vote. Usually, officeholders are
welcomed with gusto the moment they arrived.
But in
Blagojevich’s case, he was in the House for 20 minutes
Saturday before anyone in Madigan’s chamber bothered to
announce his presence, an announcement greeted by only
brief, tepid applause.
And as if that
breach of protocol wasn’t enough, while Blagojevich was
chatting a few feet away, he got belittled in a fiery
floor speech by Rep. Jack Franks (D-Woodstock) for failed
leadership and not being at the Capitol enough to
shepherd the capital bill.
Putting the
best face on what clearly was a losing spring,
Blagojevich said his feelings weren’t hurt by the episode
in the House or by the perception of being Springfield’s
least-trusted figure.
"This is a
rough and tumble business," the governor said with an
awkward laugh. "I know some people say certain things,
and there’s a lot of rhetoric in the business. But in the
final analysis, it’s what we do for people."
|