Bill would allow recall of Illinois officials
March 31, 2008
Elgin Courier News
David Gialanella
ELGIN -- One
Illinois senator calls it "buyer's remorse."
Whatever it's
called, electing the wrong person makes some wish their government came with
a return policy. If a proposed amendment to the Illinois Constitution comes
to fruition, voters soon will have the right to change their minds about
executive, legislative and judicial officers.
Dan Rutherford
State Sen. Dan
Rutherford, R-Pontiac, made one of many stops here last week in a 10-day
trip aimed at adding recall of elected state officials to the constitution.
The amendment already passed unanimously in the House State Government
Administration Committee, and could be up for a vote relatively soon,
according to Illinois Rep. Ruth Munson, R-Elgin.
Rutherford said
blatant political corruption in Springfield and elsewhere has led him and
others to demand a avenue for recourse.
"I think there
are two things that prompted this," Rutherford said. "One is Rod Blagojevich
and two is George Ryan."
According to
the proposed amendment, a petition for recall would have to come within six
months of when the official's most current term began. It requires a minimum
number of signatures equal to 20 percent of the last vote for that office.
For example, recall for a statewide office right now would require about
420,000 signatures, according to news release circulated by Rutherford.
If the
requirements are met, the recall would be added to the next ballot. A
majority vote would lead to the official's removal from office, the
amendment states.
For
ratification, the amendment would have to pass the Illinois House, the
Senate and a referendum vote, all with three-fifths majorities. The
amendment also could be proposed at a constitutional convention. During the
Nov. 4 general election, Illinoisans will be voting for or against holding
such a convention in 2010. Voters have the option of calling one every 20
years.
The 20 percent
minimum sets the bar pretty high, Rutherford said, which is important
because sometimes leaders must make unpopular decisions.
"I do not want
it to be something that would hinder an official's fortitude," he said. "You
want people to be statesmen," not politicians.
Munson could
not say when the measure might be up for a vote in the House, but said it
has a lot of support there.
"I think folks
are pretty frustrated," she said. "I'll probably vote for it. It looks like
it's moving. There's no hold on it."
As for the
Senate, it's not a hot topic just yet, said Rutherford and fellow Sen. Mike
Noland, D-Elgin.
"Is it worthy
of discussion? Yes," Noland said. "Are there more pressing matters?
Absolutely. I think there are many things Senator Rutherford could be
drawing his attention to if he's going to travel the state."
Noland added
that legislators out for Blagojevich's head can forget using recall to oust
him; legally, he could not be recalled now.
"This is not
something to be taken lightly," Noland said. "If he (Rutherford) is just
trying to get rid of the governor, I certainly would not sign onto that."
|