|
http://www.sj-r.com/News/stories/27992.asp
Blagojevich ally uses expletive in criticism
of recall amendment
4/3/2008
Springfield Journal Register
Ryan Keith
Tensions flared
Wednesday as a top ally to Gov. Rod Blagojevich angrily used an expletive on
the House floor while condemning a plan that would allow voters to oust the
governor and other top officials.
The rare outburst came
as lawmakers discussed a proposed constitutional amendment that would let
voters recall constitutional officers and state legislators.
Some of the amendment’s backers have made
clear it’s aimed at Blagojevich, whose fighting with lawmakers from both
parties has caused major gridlock on key issues during the past year.
Rep. Jay Hoffman, a Collinsville Democrat
and Blagojevich’s House floor leader, called the amendment unnecessary and
said lawmakers should focus on issues such as health-care expansion and a
statewide construction program.
“End the cycle of finger-pointing,”
Hoffman said. “Stop the bull….!”
Hoffman’s comments followed those of
several lawmakers who touted the idea, which won’t come up for a final House
vote until next week.
Rep. Jack Franks, a Woodstock Democrat
and Blagojevich critic, noted 18 other states currently have the recall
option. California replaced then-Gov. Gray Davis with Arnold Schwarzenegger
in 2003, and just last week, some New Jersey residents started a recall
effort for Gov. Jon Corzine this November.
Blagojevich hasn’t reviewed Franks’
proposal but backs the concept, spokeswoman Rebecca Rausch said.
“He supports the idea of giving voters
that kind of choice,” Rausch said.
But the recall still faces many obstacles
in Illinois, even if it’s approved by the House.
Senate President Emil Jones, D-Chicago,
is a strong ally of the governor and could block the idea. If it lands on
the November ballot, either three-fifths of voters who weigh in on the issue
or a majority of those voting overall would need to approve it. And
proponents would need hundreds of thousands of signatures just to get a
recall election held.
Still, Franks argued it is a necessary
tool to give the public more faith that elected leaders are representing
their interests.
“We have to let the people take their
government back and let them make those decisions,” Franks said. “This is
the way to do it.”
|